I am often asked how does MyMipsScore differ from the many “submission” options available in the market. A demo of our solution usually answers that question satisfactorily. But how do you compare yourself with a free option provided by the government? I am going to address that elephant in the room today…..
MIPS 2018 Quality Measure Benchmarks
In a previous blog, we had discussed some of the recent updates announced by CMS for MIPS. One of those updates was the release of Quality Benchmarks for 2018. Here are 4 key things you need to understand about MIPS 2018 Quality Benchmarks.
Interoperability: There is FHIR® at the End of the Tunnel
Azure Cosmos DB & HL7® FHIR® - A Match Made in Heaven?
The key differentiator of FHIR from any previous standards used in the healthcare is the portability of FHIR “resources”. This granular approach to storing and consuming healthcare data opens up many more new opportunities as compared to the traditional document-based methods. However, this approach also presents some challenges. Can Azure Cosmos DB be the perfect solution to those challenges?
Can MIPS on FHIR® burn QRDA and CCDA?
Picking Submission Method for Quality Category – What’s the Big Deal?
Can Registry Reporting Negatively Impact Your MIPS Score?
The Registry submission method (Qualified registries + QCDRs), has more Quality measures available for reporting than all the other submission methods. Despite that, it would be wise to compare and contrast it with EHR submission method to ensure you get the highest score for your effort and earn the end-to-end reporting bonus.
CMS Launches Real-Time Submission For MIPS
When CMS launched the QPP website, everyone was amazed. The modern look and feel combined with the simplicity made it so easy to find information about MIPS. If you thought it couldn't get better, you were wrong. CMS just launched a new "Submission Tool" (Submission API) that raises the bar to a whole new level.