Improvement scoring for the Quality performance category was introduced in the second year of MIPS (2018). As the name suggests, the improvement score will be calculated by direct comparison of performance data for Quality to the previous year’s performance. In other words, if an eligible clinicians scores better in 2019 than they did in 2018, they will be rewarded for it. This blog talks about 10 things you need to know.
I am often asked how does MyMipsScore differ from the many “submission” options available in the market. A demo of our solution usually answers that question satisfactorily. But how do you compare yourself with a free option provided by the government? I am going to address that elephant in the room today…..
Holiday times are over. 2018 is here and it brings a flurry of activity with it. It is time for 2017 MIPS data submissions, and start off the second year of MIPS on the right foot. CMS was hard at work churning out multiple updates last week to help us do exactly that. In this post, we focus on the five of the key MIPS updates that CMS recently made.
The transition year of MIPS is drawing to a close. Soon it will be submission time and time to get ready for the new performance year 2018. As we stand at the threshold of 2018, I want to give you three good reasons to give your MIPS score one last push.
“As you sow, so shall you reap” is an adage we are all familiar with. This ancient wisdom holds true for MIPS too. MIPS performance in 2017 will determine the payment adjustments in 2019. Furthermore, MIPS score will be linked to provider NPI and follow the providers even if they change groups or switch their reporting preferences.
“Scoring Improvement” bonus points for the Quality category are bonus points available in 2018 for demonstrating improvement in 2018 as compared to 2017 scores. As 2017 is the first year for MIPS, 2018 will be the first year when these bonus points will be available. Here are 10 things that you need to know about improvement bonus points in the quality category.
If your practice has made a calculated decision to pick the “Test Pace” to just avoid the penalty, you have the option to submit the 2017 MIPS data for any one of three performance categories of your choosing – ACI, Quality, or IA.
Even as the first year of MIPS winds down, complains about how complicated MIPS is, continue to dominate the news. So, we are going to take a step back and compare MIPS submissions with submission to CMS under the previous programs, and help you see how it is not as complicated as you thought.
The tale of 90 days of MIPS reporting has been told and retold many times, and like it is with most tales, it has many versions. Unlike most tales, where you can enjoy any version of your liking, the key facts in this tale have long-term implications for healthcare providers and organizations, both in terms of money and reputation. So, please read carefully.
Did it cross your mind that what would be the point of doing all the work getting ready for MIPS when CMS is offering “Pick Your Pace Options”? If it did, you are not alone. But, do you understand how much incentive money you would be giving up by using the One Patient, One Measure option?